Angelo, T. A. (1997, May). The campus as learning community: Seven promising shifts and seven powerful levers. AAHE Bulletin, 49, 3-6.

Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers (2^nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Atwell, R. H. (1996, November 29). Doctoral education must match needs and realities. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. B4.

Austin, A. E. (2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization to the academic career. Journal of Higher Education, 73, 94-122.

Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995, November/December). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27, 13-25.

Birnbaum, R. (1988). How colleges work: The cybernetics of academic organization and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Brower, A. M., & Dettinger, K. (1998, November/December). What is a learning community? Towards a comprehensive model. About Campus, 3, 15-21.

Cabrera, A. F., Colbeck C. L., & Terenzini P. T. (2001). Developing performance indicators for assessing classroom teaching practices and student learning. Research in Higher Education, 42, 327-352.

Cabrera, A. F., & Nora, A. (1994). College students’ perceptions of prejudice and discrimination and their feelings of alienation: A construct validation approach. Review of Education/Pedagogy/Cultural, 16, 387-409.

Cambridge, B. L. (2002). Linking change initiatives: The Carnegie Academy for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in the company of other national projects. In D. Lieberman & C. Wehlburg (Eds.), To improve the academy: Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (Vol. 20, pp. 38-48). Bolton, MA: Anker.

Center for Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education. Committee on Undergraduate Science Education. (1999). Transforming undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (Eds.). (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.

Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 24, pp. 249-305). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Colbeck, C. (2002). Assessing institutionalization of curricular and pedagogical reform. Research in Higher Education, 43, 397-421.

Colbeck, C., Cabrera, A., & Marine, R. (2001, June). Assessing overall competence of faculty: EC Criterion 5. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, Albuquerque, NM.

Colbeck, C., Cabrera, A., & Terenzini, P.T. (2001). Learning professional confidence: Linking teaching practices, students’ self-perceptions, and gender. Review of Higher Education, 24, 173-191.

Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP) of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. (1995). Reshaping the graduate education of scientists and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP) of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. (2000). Enhancing the postdoctoral experience for scientists and engineers: A guide for postdoctoral scholars, advisers, institutions, funding organizations, and disciplinary societies. Washington, DC : National Academy Press.

Coppola, B. P., & Jacobs, D. C. (2002). Is the scholarship of teaching and learning new to chemistry? In M. T. Huber & S. P. Morreale (Eds.), Disciplinary styles in the scholarship of teaching and learning: Exploring common ground (pp. 197-216).  Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education & Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Cross, K. P. (1990). Classroom research: Helping professors learn more about teaching and learning. In P. Seldin (Ed.), How administrators can improve teaching: Moving from talk to action in higher education (pp. 122-142). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Cross, K. P., & Steadman, M. H. (1996). Classroom research: Implementing the scholarship of teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Drew, D. W. (1996). Aptitude revisited: Rethinking math and science education for America’s next century. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Eiseman, J., & Fairweather, J. S. (1996). Evaluation of the National Science Foundation Undergraduate Course and Curriculum Development Program: Final report. Washington, DC: SRI International.

Eisner, E. W. (1984). The art of educational evaluation. Bristol, PA: Falmer.

Fairweather, J. (2000). Reform efforts in postsecondary science, mathematics, and engineering education: To institutionalize or not: That is the question. Symposium paper presented at the American Association of Higher Education Forum on Faculty Roles and Rewards, New Orleans, LA.

Fairweather, J. S. (1996). Faculty work and public trust: Restoring the value of teaching and public service in American academic life. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Finkelstein, M. J., Seal, R. K., & Schuster, J. H. (1998). The new academic generation: A profession in transformation. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Foertsch, J. A., Millar, S. B., Squire, L. L., & Gunter, R. L. (1997). Persuading professors: A study of the dissemination of educational reform in research institutions. Madison: University of Wisconsin–Madison, LEAD Center.

Gabelnick, F. G., MacGregor, J., Matthews, R. S., & Smith, B. L. (Eds.). (1990). Learning communities: Building connections among students, faculty, and disciplines (New Directions for Student Services No. 41). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Gaff, J. G., & Lambert, L. M. (1996, July/August). Socializing future faculty to the values of undergraduate education. Change, 28, 38-45.

Gaff, J. G., Pruitt-Logan, A. S., Weibl, R. A., & Others. (2000). Building the faculty we need: Colleges and universities working together. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities. 

Golde, C. M., & Dore, T. M. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. Philadelphia, PA: Pew Charitable Trusts.

Grandy, J. (1998). Persistence in science of high-ability minority students. Journal of Higher Education, 69, 589-620.

Green, M. F. (1997). Institutional leadership in the change process. In M. F. Green (Ed.), Transforming higher education: Views from leaders around the world (pp. 27-56). Phoenix, AZ: Oryx.

Gumport, P. J., & Pusser, B. (1997). Restructuring the academic environment. In M. W. Peterson, D. D. Dill, L. A. Mets, & Associates (Eds.), Planning and management for a changing environment: A handbook for redesigning institutions (pp. 453-478). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Hackman, J. R., Oldham, G. R., Janson, R., & Purdy, K. (1975). A new strategy for job enrichment. California Management Review, 17(4), 57-71.

Huba, M., & Freed, J. (2000). Learner-centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Lawler, E. E. (1986). High involvement management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Lenning, O. T., & Ebbers, L. H. (1999). The powerful potential of learning communities: Improving education for the future (ASHE/ERIC Higher Education Report No. 6). Washington DC: The George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development.

Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. S. (1998).  Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Massy, W. F., Wilger, A. K., & Colbeck, C. (1994, July/August). Overcoming “hollowed” collegiality: Departmental cultures and teaching quality. Change, 26, 11-20.

Menges, R. J., & Austin, A. E. (2001). Teaching in higher education. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4^th ed., pp. 1122-1156). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Mundry, S., Britton, E., Raizen, S., & Loucks-Horsley, S. (2000). Designing successful professional meetings and conferences in education: Planning, implementation, and evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards: Observe, interact, change, learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Science and Technology Council. (2000). Ensuring a strong U.S. scientific technical and engineering workforce in the 21^st century. Retrieved from http://www.ostp.gov/html/workforcerpt.pdf

National Science Foundation. (1996). Shaping the future: New expectations for undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Washington, DC: Author.

Nettles, M. T., Thoeny, A. R., & Gosman, E. J. (1986). Comparative and predictive analysis of black and white students’ college achievement and experiences. Journal of Higher Education, 57, 289-328.

Nyquist, J., & Woodford, B. (2000). Re-envisioning the Ph.D.: What concerns do we have? Seattle: University of Washington, Center for Instructional Development and Research.

Perry, R. P., & Smart, J. C. (Eds.). (1997). Effective teaching in higher education: Research and practice. New York: Agathon.

Pike, G. R. (1999). The effects of residential learning communities and traditional residential living arrangements on educational gains during the first year of college. Journal of College Student Development, 40, 269-283.

Project 2061/American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans : A Project 2061 report on literacy goals in science, mathematics, and technology. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Project MUSE (Modeling for Understanding in Science Education) Web site, http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/ncisla/muse/

Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4^th ed.). New York: Free Press.

Sack, R., Bras, R. L., Daniel, D. E., Hendrickson, C., Smith, K. A., & Levitan, H. (1999, November). Reinventing civil engineering education. Paper presented at ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Juan, Puerto Rico.

Sanders, K., Carlson-Dakes, C., Dettinger, K., Hajnal, C., Laedtke, M., & Squire, L. (1997). A new starting point for faculty development in higher education: Creating a collaborative learning environment. In D. DeZure (Ed.), To Improve the Academy: Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (Vol. 16, pp. 117-150). Stillwater, OK: New Forums.

Sax, L. J. (2001). Undergraduate science majors: Gender differences in who goes to graduate school. Review of Higher Education, 24, 153-172.

Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview.

Shapiro, N. S., & Levine, J. H. (1999). Creating learning communities: A practical guide to winning support, organizing for change, and implementing programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Stark, J. S., & Lattuca, L. R. (1997). Shaping the college curriculum: Academic plans in action. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613-629.

Stewart, J., Cartier, J., & Passmore, C. (in press). Project MUSE: Secondary science classrooms that promote learning with understanding. In How people learn II: A view from the classroom (tentative title). Washington, DC: National Research Council.

Tierney, W. G. (Ed.) (1999). Building the responsive campus: Creating high performance colleges and universities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Tinto, V. (1997). Classrooms as communities: Exploring the educational character of student persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 68, 599-623.

Tobias, S. (1992). Revitalizing undergraduate science: Why some things work and most don’t. Tucson, AZ: Research Corporation.

Tornatzky, L. G., Fleischer, M., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

Tracey, T. J., & Sedlacek, W. E. (1987). Prediction of college graduation using noncognitive variables by race. Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 19, 177-184.

Wright, J. C., Millar, S. B., Kosciuk, S. A., Penberthy, D. L., Williams, P. H., & Wampold, B. E. (1998). A novel strategy for assessing the effects of curriculum reform on student competence. Journal of Chemical Education, 75, 986-992.

CIRTL
1025 W. Johnson St.
Madison, WI 53706
ph.: 608.263.0630
fax: 608.265.0538